Alhamdulillah! Semuanya dengan kehendak Allah SWT Qada' dan Qadarnya... Jika datang kebenaran maka akan terhapuslah kebatilan!..
Mahkamah Rayuan hari ini mengumumkan Datuk Seri Zambry Abd Kadir sebagai menteri besar Perak yang sah.
Keputusan itu membatalkan penghakiman Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur minggu lalu yang mengesahkan kedudukan asal Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin.
Panel tiga hakim itu - yang telah mendengar hujah kedua-dua pihak di Putrajaya seharian semalam - sebulat suara menerima rayuan Zambry.
Dalam penghakimannya, ketiga-tiga mereka berhujah bahawa hakim mahkamah tinggi Datuk Abdul Aziz Abd Rahim membuat kesilapan dalam keputusannya dan Sultan Perak layak melantik Zambry apabila Mohamad Nizar hilang majoriti dalam DUN.
Pada 11 Mei lalu, mahkamah tinggi mengumumkan Mohamad Nizar sebagai menteri besar sah setelah digugurkan jawatan tersebut, awal Februari lalu.
Abdul Aziz memutuskan bahawa wakil rakyat PAS itu tidak pernah mengosongkan jawatannya itu kerana beliau tidak kehilangan kepercayaan majoriti anggota DUN Perak.
Dalam kes ini, Abdul Aziz berkata tiada undi tidak percaya telah diusulkan terhadap Mohamad Nizar.
Tetapi kegembiraan menteri besar Pakatan Rakyat itu tidak kekal apabila Mahkamah Rayuan keesokannya membenarkan permohonan Zambry untuk menangguhkan keputusan mahkamah tersebut.
Penangguhan keputusan mahkamah itu diberikan sementara menunggu selesai rayuan berhubung perkara tersebut hari ini.
Sementara itu, peguam Nizar, Sulaiman Abdullah memberitahu mahkamah bahawa pihaknya akan mengemukakan rayuan kepada Mahkamah Persekutuan.
Jumaat, Mei 22, 2009
Pas takut UMNO bertanding di Manek Urai
PAS mencadangkan Umno agar tidak bertanding dalam pilihanraya kecil DUN Manek Urai bagi menjimatkan wang termasuk kos perbelanjaan Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya dan polis.
Pengarah Pilihanraya PAS Datuk Mustafa Ali berkata, alasan ini digunakan Umno ketika tidak bertanding di Penanti.
Pilihanraya kecil DUN tersebut bermula esok hingga 31 Mei.
"Kalau BN menang (di Manek Urai), ia tidak mengubah majoriti kerana kita (PAS) ada majoriti dua pertiga yang besar (di Kelantan)," katanya pagi ini dalam sidang media di ibu pejabat PAS bagi mengumumkan kematian mengejut seorang wakil rakyatnya.
Pilihanraya kecil DUN Manek Urai akan diadakan dalam tempoh 60 hari lagi berikutan kematian penyandangnya Ismail Yaakob subuh tadi.
Mustafa berkata, PAS akan meletakkan calonnya bagi mempertahankan Manek Urai. Bagaimanapun, tambahnya, terlalu awal untuk menyatakan calon PAS di kerusi tersebut.
Mustafa juga mendakwa Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Razak tidak boleh membuat keputusan sendiri sama ada bertanding atau tidak.
Nampaknya PAS takut UMNO masuk bertanding di Manek Urai maklumlah pemimpin PAS kan sedang ber'perang' sekarang untuk merebut jawatan utama di peringkat pusat. Sebaimana yang diketahui PAS sekarang berpecah kepada 2 iaitu kumpulan pro Anwar dan Pro Muqabalah....
Sedikit sebanyak bibit pergeseran tetap ada walaupun mahu disembunyikan oleh PAS. Itulah kita lihat trend ramai ahli PAS yang cuba berlapang dada dan menafikan apa yang berlaku untuk selamatkan PAS dan seterusnya menghalang terbuka pekong di dada.
Namun kita lihat pemilihan PAS ini ialah untuk survival kumpulan pro anwar ataupun ulama. Nampaknya ada kumpulan tertentu pun sudah mula menggunakan politik wang untuk mendapatkan undi dari perwakilan. Kemungkinan politik wang tidak berlaku dalam pemilihan sebelum ini namun apabila Anwar Ibrahim yang terkenal dengan politik wangnya dalam UMNO ketika menjatuhkan Ghafar Baba kini rasuah mula menular di kalangan ahli PAS...
Bagi Pilihanraya Kecil Manek Urai terpulang kepada DS Najib untuk memutuskan samada untuk bertanding ataupun tidak... UMNO tidak pernah rugi kerusi di Kelantan jika tidak bertanding kerana mereka masih umat Melayu dan Islam.
Pengarah Pilihanraya PAS Datuk Mustafa Ali berkata, alasan ini digunakan Umno ketika tidak bertanding di Penanti.
Pilihanraya kecil DUN tersebut bermula esok hingga 31 Mei.
"Kalau BN menang (di Manek Urai), ia tidak mengubah majoriti kerana kita (PAS) ada majoriti dua pertiga yang besar (di Kelantan)," katanya pagi ini dalam sidang media di ibu pejabat PAS bagi mengumumkan kematian mengejut seorang wakil rakyatnya.
Pilihanraya kecil DUN Manek Urai akan diadakan dalam tempoh 60 hari lagi berikutan kematian penyandangnya Ismail Yaakob subuh tadi.
Mustafa berkata, PAS akan meletakkan calonnya bagi mempertahankan Manek Urai. Bagaimanapun, tambahnya, terlalu awal untuk menyatakan calon PAS di kerusi tersebut.
Mustafa juga mendakwa Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Razak tidak boleh membuat keputusan sendiri sama ada bertanding atau tidak.
Nampaknya PAS takut UMNO masuk bertanding di Manek Urai maklumlah pemimpin PAS kan sedang ber'perang' sekarang untuk merebut jawatan utama di peringkat pusat. Sebaimana yang diketahui PAS sekarang berpecah kepada 2 iaitu kumpulan pro Anwar dan Pro Muqabalah....
Sedikit sebanyak bibit pergeseran tetap ada walaupun mahu disembunyikan oleh PAS. Itulah kita lihat trend ramai ahli PAS yang cuba berlapang dada dan menafikan apa yang berlaku untuk selamatkan PAS dan seterusnya menghalang terbuka pekong di dada.
Namun kita lihat pemilihan PAS ini ialah untuk survival kumpulan pro anwar ataupun ulama. Nampaknya ada kumpulan tertentu pun sudah mula menggunakan politik wang untuk mendapatkan undi dari perwakilan. Kemungkinan politik wang tidak berlaku dalam pemilihan sebelum ini namun apabila Anwar Ibrahim yang terkenal dengan politik wangnya dalam UMNO ketika menjatuhkan Ghafar Baba kini rasuah mula menular di kalangan ahli PAS...
Bagi Pilihanraya Kecil Manek Urai terpulang kepada DS Najib untuk memutuskan samada untuk bertanding ataupun tidak... UMNO tidak pernah rugi kerusi di Kelantan jika tidak bertanding kerana mereka masih umat Melayu dan Islam.
Enough is enough!
Hindraf. An illegal organization which claims to be the “voice” of hero for the Indian ethnic, had demanded for an equality of status quo as the “bumiputera” in Malaysia.
A proposal will be made by Hindraft leader, M. Manoharan, to our Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak. He proposed that “all Malaysia who born after 31st of August 1957 should be accorded as Bumiputera status. He claims that the proposal was made to suit “one Malaysia” concept?
Bumiputera can be defined as :
Peninsular Malaysia
"If one of the parents is Muslim Malay or Orang Asli as stated in Article 160 (2) Federal Constitution of Malaysia; thus the child is considered as a Bumiputra"
Sabah
"If a father is a Muslim Malay or indigenous native of Sabah as stated in Article 160A (6)(a) Federal Constitution of Malaysia; thus his child is considered as a Bumiputra"
Sarawak
"If both of the parent are indigenous native of Sarawak as stated in Article 160A (6)(b) Federal Constitution of Malaysia; thus their child is considered as a Bumiputra"
In article 153, the federal constitution of Malaysia had indicates that Yang Di Pertuan Agong will be the safeguard of Bumiputera’s interests. It means that Yang Di Pertuan Agong is the “supreme power” to maintain the interest of Bumiputera, the status quo in demand of Hindraf.
Why Hindraf really wants the Bumiputera status quo? Perhaps that they wanted to have the “special” rights own by the Malays and the origins of which stated in the Federal Constitution. They want to be treated equally as Bumiputera, as they were born in Malaysia, live in Malaysia and working in Malaysia.
Demanding against the constitutions, showing that they are not thankful to the Bumiputera and the state ruler of Malaysia, DYMM Yang Di Pertuan Agong. They forget the “Social Contract” which had been “agreed”.
They had been given the citizenship of Malaysia which will not be ever given to Malays in India. It is impossible for every Bumiputera in Malaysia to get the citizenship of India in every angle if they migrated to India.
And the Bumiputera and the Malays’ rulers were “very generous” to give them the status of citizenship in their country.
They demand for the Bumiputera status again while we give them the right to practice their religion, customs and they are free to practice their way of life in Malaysia.
The Government of Malaysia allows the Indians to build their temples and even help them to build their biggest temple at Batu Caves! The Government even funds their religious activities, their community and helps them to get a better life in Malaysia compared to their fathers and grand grandfathers.
We give them opportunity to be well educated in Malaysia. Their children get the same right as the Bumiputera children in school. They are even free to run their business in Malaysia. They get rich and richer, even some of them are declared as business tycoons in Malaysia. Ananda Krishnan and Tony Fernandez are some of the most successful fellow among them.
By the citizenship given, the ethnic Indian gets their every chance to participate in politics. They had been given the chance to cast their vote on the Malaysia election. They have their right to choose their state assemblyman, members of Parliament, and even the ruling government. Most of the Indian are very good citizens to vote for the current Malaysia ruling government as the sign of “thankfulness”. And these Indians are of course are not Hindraf!
Deyyy Hindraf!
Will the Malaysia’s Bumiputera get the same life if they live in India right now?
Will Bumiputera get their right to run their business “without any question” in India?
Will we get every single chance to cast vote in India state elections?
Will we get subsidies in India just the same like you now?
And will we get what you get in Malaysia if we migrate to your very own origin country?
Think about it for thousands times and you will get the same answer.
And the answer is still “NO”, right?
Please be a good citizen of Malaysia. Stop making riot! Do not ever ask or question the right of the Bumiputera as it mention in the “social contract”.
Do not try to “touch” the “social contract” or even ask to review the “social contract” again.
It “hurt” us, the bumiputera!
And don’t ever think to threat us with “road demos” or “unlawful gathering” if we reject your demands, because we “will not ever” granted your wish. I remind you not to blame us if you are arrested making riots to our beloved country. This is our beloved country, you and me!
You get so much from us in this country. Why do you demand for more? You touch our sensitivity. Don’t you feel “guilty”? You make bumiputera angry. Don’t you think what we feel by making such demands? We can’t accept it. Don’t say that we are “racist”. Being “racist” has nothing to do with your demands. We are just protecting out right. We are the real bumiputera in Malaysia according to the history, constitutions and the “world” even “certified” our status.
Please. Live in peace. We are “1 Malaysian”!
A proposal will be made by Hindraft leader, M. Manoharan, to our Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak. He proposed that “all Malaysia who born after 31st of August 1957 should be accorded as Bumiputera status. He claims that the proposal was made to suit “one Malaysia” concept?
Bumiputera can be defined as :
Peninsular Malaysia
"If one of the parents is Muslim Malay or Orang Asli as stated in Article 160 (2) Federal Constitution of Malaysia; thus the child is considered as a Bumiputra"
Sabah
"If a father is a Muslim Malay or indigenous native of Sabah as stated in Article 160A (6)(a) Federal Constitution of Malaysia; thus his child is considered as a Bumiputra"
Sarawak
"If both of the parent are indigenous native of Sarawak as stated in Article 160A (6)(b) Federal Constitution of Malaysia; thus their child is considered as a Bumiputra"
In article 153, the federal constitution of Malaysia had indicates that Yang Di Pertuan Agong will be the safeguard of Bumiputera’s interests. It means that Yang Di Pertuan Agong is the “supreme power” to maintain the interest of Bumiputera, the status quo in demand of Hindraf.
Why Hindraf really wants the Bumiputera status quo? Perhaps that they wanted to have the “special” rights own by the Malays and the origins of which stated in the Federal Constitution. They want to be treated equally as Bumiputera, as they were born in Malaysia, live in Malaysia and working in Malaysia.
Demanding against the constitutions, showing that they are not thankful to the Bumiputera and the state ruler of Malaysia, DYMM Yang Di Pertuan Agong. They forget the “Social Contract” which had been “agreed”.
They had been given the citizenship of Malaysia which will not be ever given to Malays in India. It is impossible for every Bumiputera in Malaysia to get the citizenship of India in every angle if they migrated to India.
And the Bumiputera and the Malays’ rulers were “very generous” to give them the status of citizenship in their country.
They demand for the Bumiputera status again while we give them the right to practice their religion, customs and they are free to practice their way of life in Malaysia.
The Government of Malaysia allows the Indians to build their temples and even help them to build their biggest temple at Batu Caves! The Government even funds their religious activities, their community and helps them to get a better life in Malaysia compared to their fathers and grand grandfathers.
We give them opportunity to be well educated in Malaysia. Their children get the same right as the Bumiputera children in school. They are even free to run their business in Malaysia. They get rich and richer, even some of them are declared as business tycoons in Malaysia. Ananda Krishnan and Tony Fernandez are some of the most successful fellow among them.
By the citizenship given, the ethnic Indian gets their every chance to participate in politics. They had been given the chance to cast their vote on the Malaysia election. They have their right to choose their state assemblyman, members of Parliament, and even the ruling government. Most of the Indian are very good citizens to vote for the current Malaysia ruling government as the sign of “thankfulness”. And these Indians are of course are not Hindraf!
Deyyy Hindraf!
Will the Malaysia’s Bumiputera get the same life if they live in India right now?
Will Bumiputera get their right to run their business “without any question” in India?
Will we get every single chance to cast vote in India state elections?
Will we get subsidies in India just the same like you now?
And will we get what you get in Malaysia if we migrate to your very own origin country?
Think about it for thousands times and you will get the same answer.
And the answer is still “NO”, right?
Please be a good citizen of Malaysia. Stop making riot! Do not ever ask or question the right of the Bumiputera as it mention in the “social contract”.
Do not try to “touch” the “social contract” or even ask to review the “social contract” again.
It “hurt” us, the bumiputera!
And don’t ever think to threat us with “road demos” or “unlawful gathering” if we reject your demands, because we “will not ever” granted your wish. I remind you not to blame us if you are arrested making riots to our beloved country. This is our beloved country, you and me!
You get so much from us in this country. Why do you demand for more? You touch our sensitivity. Don’t you feel “guilty”? You make bumiputera angry. Don’t you think what we feel by making such demands? We can’t accept it. Don’t say that we are “racist”. Being “racist” has nothing to do with your demands. We are just protecting out right. We are the real bumiputera in Malaysia according to the history, constitutions and the “world” even “certified” our status.
Please. Live in peace. We are “1 Malaysian”!
Penarikan diri Haron Din memberi peluang kepada puak 'Muqabalah'
Timbalan Mursyidul Am PAS Datuk Dr Haron Din menarik diri daripada perebutan kerusi timbalan presiden hari ini tetapi keputusan itu belum tentu membuka peluang Datuk Husam Musa memenanginya.
Sebagai tokoh agama popular, Dr Haron (foto) dilihat berpotensi memecahkan undi kumpulan pro-muqabalah yang sealiran dengan penyandangnya Nasharuddin Mat Isa, sekaligus memberikan kelebihan kepada naib presiden PAS itu.
Undi aliran bukan pro-muqabalah di belakang Husam mungkin berpecah dua jika seorang lagi naib presiden Mohamad Sabu enggan menarik diri daripada persaingan sengit tersebut.
Daripada lima nama yang dicalonkan untuk jawatan nombor dua, hanya Husam dan Mohamad yang tidak dikenali sebagai ulama, sementara dua lagi termasuk Haron telah menarik diri.
Datuk Seri Azizan Razak kelmarin menjadi orang pertama menarik diri dengan alasan ingin menumpukan kepada tugasnya sebagai menteri besar Kedah.
Tidak dapat dipastikan sama ada penarikan diri Dr Haron itu sengaja dirancang dalam strategi aliran pro-muqabalah untuk memantapkan sokongan terhadap Nasharuddin.
Dalam pertandingan tiga penjuru, Husam jelas sekali terpaksa berdepan populariti Nasharuddin – berdasarkan jumlah pencalonan – sewaktu sokongan kepadanya terbelah dua dengan Mohamad.
'Sedang berunding'
Mohamad, seorang lagi tokoh popular PAS, walaupun bersemangat sekali untuk mencabar Nasharuddin, disebut-sebut akan membuka laluan kepada Husam.
Keputusan muktamad akan diketahui seawal-awalnya 25 Mei ini - tarikh tutup untuk calon-calon mengesahkan pencalonan mereka bertanding dalam pemilihan pucuk pimpinan PAS kali ini.
Malaysiakini bagaimanapun difahamkan, rundingan antara kumpulan Husam dengan Mohamad akan terus berjalan walaupun di saat-saat akhir pertanding di muktamar di Shah Alam, yang dijadual bermula 5 Jun ini.
Sumber-sumber dua kumpulan tersebut memberitahu, beberapa siri rundingan antara dua tokoh PAS itu telah berlangsung "tetapi belum ada kata sepakat" dicapai.
"Matlamat mereka (berdua) sama, mahu jatuhkan Nasharuddin, sebab itu ada kemungkinan wujud kompromi," kata sumber.
Sumber-sumber percaya Nasharuddin kini amat selesa dengan jumlah pencalonan yang diperolehinya - dilaporkan lebih separuh daripada 137 kawasan yang bermesyuarat bulan lalu.
'Tunggu Isnin ini'
Difahamkan, Husam mendapat hanya mendapat 28 pencalonan, sementara Mohamad tidak jauh di belakang dengan 26 sokongan kawasan.
Haron mendapat tujuh pencalonan, manakala maklumat pencalonan Azizan pula tidak diperolehi.
Sementara menunggu tarikh pengesahan pencalonan Isnin ini, Husam akan "berpuasa" daripada memberikan sebarang kenyataan media berhubung pertandingan ini.
Beliau difahamkan masih meninjau sikap para perwakilan sebelum memutuskan sama ada wajar mencabar Nasharuddin atau mempertahankan jawatan naib presiden yang disandangnya sekarang.
Sumber yang sama memberitahu, walaupun ahli-ahli akar umbi umumnya menolak rundingan sulit Umno-PAS seperti yang disertai sendiri oleh Nasharuddin, tetapi para perwakilan belum tentu menolak beliau dengan alasan "kesetiaan atau wala' kepada pucuk pimpinan."
Kesetiaan ini lebih kuat jika pemimpin itu berlatarbelakang agama seperti Nasharuddin, kata sumber lagi.
Muktamar di Stadium Malawati sehingga 7 Mei ini akan menentukan sama ada doktrin tersebut akan memberikan kelebihan kepada timbalan Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang itu atau berjaya dipecahkan dan sekali gus menguntungkan Husam, bekas setiausaha Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat.
Sebagai tokoh agama popular, Dr Haron (foto) dilihat berpotensi memecahkan undi kumpulan pro-muqabalah yang sealiran dengan penyandangnya Nasharuddin Mat Isa, sekaligus memberikan kelebihan kepada naib presiden PAS itu.
Undi aliran bukan pro-muqabalah di belakang Husam mungkin berpecah dua jika seorang lagi naib presiden Mohamad Sabu enggan menarik diri daripada persaingan sengit tersebut.
Daripada lima nama yang dicalonkan untuk jawatan nombor dua, hanya Husam dan Mohamad yang tidak dikenali sebagai ulama, sementara dua lagi termasuk Haron telah menarik diri.
Datuk Seri Azizan Razak kelmarin menjadi orang pertama menarik diri dengan alasan ingin menumpukan kepada tugasnya sebagai menteri besar Kedah.
Tidak dapat dipastikan sama ada penarikan diri Dr Haron itu sengaja dirancang dalam strategi aliran pro-muqabalah untuk memantapkan sokongan terhadap Nasharuddin.
Dalam pertandingan tiga penjuru, Husam jelas sekali terpaksa berdepan populariti Nasharuddin – berdasarkan jumlah pencalonan – sewaktu sokongan kepadanya terbelah dua dengan Mohamad.
'Sedang berunding'
Mohamad, seorang lagi tokoh popular PAS, walaupun bersemangat sekali untuk mencabar Nasharuddin, disebut-sebut akan membuka laluan kepada Husam.
Keputusan muktamad akan diketahui seawal-awalnya 25 Mei ini - tarikh tutup untuk calon-calon mengesahkan pencalonan mereka bertanding dalam pemilihan pucuk pimpinan PAS kali ini.
Malaysiakini bagaimanapun difahamkan, rundingan antara kumpulan Husam dengan Mohamad akan terus berjalan walaupun di saat-saat akhir pertanding di muktamar di Shah Alam, yang dijadual bermula 5 Jun ini.
Sumber-sumber dua kumpulan tersebut memberitahu, beberapa siri rundingan antara dua tokoh PAS itu telah berlangsung "tetapi belum ada kata sepakat" dicapai.
"Matlamat mereka (berdua) sama, mahu jatuhkan Nasharuddin, sebab itu ada kemungkinan wujud kompromi," kata sumber.
Sumber-sumber percaya Nasharuddin kini amat selesa dengan jumlah pencalonan yang diperolehinya - dilaporkan lebih separuh daripada 137 kawasan yang bermesyuarat bulan lalu.
'Tunggu Isnin ini'
Difahamkan, Husam mendapat hanya mendapat 28 pencalonan, sementara Mohamad tidak jauh di belakang dengan 26 sokongan kawasan.
Haron mendapat tujuh pencalonan, manakala maklumat pencalonan Azizan pula tidak diperolehi.
Sementara menunggu tarikh pengesahan pencalonan Isnin ini, Husam akan "berpuasa" daripada memberikan sebarang kenyataan media berhubung pertandingan ini.
Beliau difahamkan masih meninjau sikap para perwakilan sebelum memutuskan sama ada wajar mencabar Nasharuddin atau mempertahankan jawatan naib presiden yang disandangnya sekarang.
Sumber yang sama memberitahu, walaupun ahli-ahli akar umbi umumnya menolak rundingan sulit Umno-PAS seperti yang disertai sendiri oleh Nasharuddin, tetapi para perwakilan belum tentu menolak beliau dengan alasan "kesetiaan atau wala' kepada pucuk pimpinan."
Kesetiaan ini lebih kuat jika pemimpin itu berlatarbelakang agama seperti Nasharuddin, kata sumber lagi.
Muktamar di Stadium Malawati sehingga 7 Mei ini akan menentukan sama ada doktrin tersebut akan memberikan kelebihan kepada timbalan Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang itu atau berjaya dipecahkan dan sekali gus menguntungkan Husam, bekas setiausaha Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat.
Khamis, Mei 21, 2009
Rasuah bukan baru dalam Pas
Saya seronok baca mengenai rasuah dalam PAS. Selama ini pemimpin PAS berkokok tidak henti-henti bahawa pemilihan UMNO penuh dengan rasuah.Tetapi PAS sendiri bukan sahaja bergelumang dengan rasuah tetapi juga menggalakkan rasuah.
Yang nyata, Musyridul Am PAS, Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat tidak menolak kemungkinan berlaku rasuah ataupun politik wang semasa berlangsung pemilihan peringkat kawasan bulan lepas. Beliau tidak menolak mentah-mentah dakwaan yang dibuat oleh Ketua Dewan Ulama, Mohamed Daud Iraqi.
Nik Aziz juga tidak dapat menentukan apakah Mat Iraq memberi nasihat ataupun beliau (Mat Iraqi) ada bukti bila menuduh berlaku rasuah dalam pemilihan PAS.
Saya ingin penjenguk fikir satu perkara sebelum menilai tulisan saudara Mohd Sayuti Omar bertajuk “Jangan Sembunyi Rasuah Bawah Kupiah “Celoteh Murai 45” melalui blognya untuk renungan bersama. Saya perturunkan beberapa para untuk tetapan.
Hakikatnya PAS sudah lama bergelumang dengan RASUAH SECARA TERANG-TERANGAN.
Bukan sekadar menawarkan ‘syurga’ dan perkara-perkara Islam sahaja.
Ambil sahaja fatwa Nik Aziz “Beri duit ambil, beri kain pakai, beri gula kacau, bila mengundi pangkah bulan. …”
Kata-kata ini merujuk kepada kononnya ‘rasuah UMNO dan Barisan Nasional (BN)’ kepada pengundi pada musim pilihan raya.
Pokoknya – jika DUIT, KAIN, KOPI, GULA bersifat rasuah, apakah wajar pengundi PAS (sudah pasti Islam) mengambilnya? Apakah agama Islam menggalakkan orang Islam pejam mata mengambil apa sahaja bentuk pemberian berunsur rasuah.
dipetik dari http://hambali1.blogspot.com
Tidakkah PAS menganggap wang, kain dan minuman itu rasuah? Kenapa kepada penyokong dan pengikut PAS ‘pemberian UMNO dan BN itu halal’ dan kepada penyokong UMNO dan BN haram?
Setahu saya rasuah berlaku apabila ada orang memberi dan menerima. Dia bukan di pihak pemberi sahaja. Malah lebih buruk, apabila Nik Aziz berfatwa ‘menghalalkan orang PAS menerima rasuah, walaupun wang, kain, kopi dan gula’.
Jadi tidak hairan kalau dalam pemilihan parti, ada perbuatan rasuah dilakukan dan cita-cita untuk menang dalam pemilihan tetap tinggi, kalaupun pemimpin PAS mendakwa merekalah benar-benar Islam.
Jadi jom kita tinjau apa kata Sayuti:
1. Mat Iraq tidak dikenakan apa-apa tindakan. Kalau benar tidak ada rasuah dalam PAS kenapa Mat Iraq tidak dikenakan tindakan disiplin? Apakah PAS memberi amaran kepada Mat Iraq? Kalau amaran kenapa pula tidak disebut ia diberikan amaran? Logik dan adilnya kalau dah buat fitnah, hukum saja jangan taruh dan simpan lagi. Pas tentu arif mengenai bahaya fitnah dan kata-kata Rasulullah mengenai anaknya Fatimah! Apakah PAS juga mengamalkan tindakan double standard macam parti cap keris itu?
2. Hadi (Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang) cuba menyembunyikan isu rasuah atau politik wang di bawah kupiah kerana nak jaga maruah parti. Tentu Hadi tahu apa hukumnya hipokrit dan munafik serta persoalan di Mahsyar kelak. Kalau Hadi juga berbuat begitu bermakna Hadi juga mengamalkan politik tusuk punca dalam kain?
3. Murai cukup benci kalau orang bercakap; berkatalah yang benar walaupun pahit, tetapi bila kena gilirannya sendiri yang pahit tidak mahu dikatakan dan hanya suka mengatakan yang manis-manis sahaja. Keputusan yang Pas ambil berhubung dengan rasuah itu menjelaskan bagaimana wibawa para ulama dalam PAS itu sendiri!
Sebenarnya bagi PAS, memang dia pandai menutup kelemahan parti dan pemimpinnya.
PAS berbeza dengan UMNO bukan dalam konteks Islamnya tetapi cara pemimpin utama PAS menutup dosa dan kelemahan pemimpinnya.
Saya bersetuju dengan Sayuti kalau beliau mengandaikan PAS menutup perbuatan rasuah dengan kopiahnya.
Bukan ini kali pertama PAS menutup kelemahan pemimpinnya. Ada beberapa kes rasuah lain PAS selindungkan, termasuk rasuah dalam Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan.
PAS juga bijak menutup malu parti dan pemimpinnya. Lihatlah berapa banyak kes khalwat dan ‘main dengan bini’ orang PAS boleh tutup rapat-rapat.
Inilah sahaja kelebihan pemimpin dan ahli PAS. Pemimpin tutup kesilapan dan ahli menerima dan kunci mulut. ‘Tidak baik memperkatakan dan menyebarkan aib orang lain”
Tetapi UMNO, pemimpin dan hali tidak reti tutup atau lindungi salah laku pemimpinnya.
Pemimpin buka mulut seluas-luasnya kalau ada perbuatan rasuah di kalangan pemimpin dan ahli UMNO jadi tukang karut yang menjaja ke seluruh negara. “Lebih banyak dedah, walaupun aib, lebih seronok”.
Lihat sahaja isu rasuah dalam pemilihan parti UMNO yang lalu. Yang dipanggil dan didakwa beratus-ratus. Belum tentu salah sudah nampak bersalah.
Yang kena tindakan seorang dua tetapi hebohnya sampai satu dunia.
Lebih memburukkan keadaan yang tidak didakwa ada beratus-ratus dan selepas pemilihan, Jawatankuasa Disiplin pun tidak berfungsi dan UMNO dilihat parti yang mengamalkan rasuah.
Sewajarnya kalau mahu nampak bersih, bicara dan dakwa dan bagi yang bersih, umumkan nama mereka sebagai ‘bersih daripada rasuah’, bukan longgokkan dengan yang memang sewajarnya didakwa.
Akhirnya, kononnya mahu dilihat bersih dan bersedia menjadi telus – UMNO dilihat parti kotor dan rasuah sedangkan PAS parti bersih dan Islam.
Tiba pilihan raya UMNO yang telus putih mata dan PAS yang menutup dosa dan kejahatan di bawah kopiah di lihat bersih dan disokong oleh rakyat yang dibutakan mata melalui fatwa – termasuk fatwa Nik Aziz mengenai duit, wang, kopi dan gula
Yang nyata, Musyridul Am PAS, Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat tidak menolak kemungkinan berlaku rasuah ataupun politik wang semasa berlangsung pemilihan peringkat kawasan bulan lepas. Beliau tidak menolak mentah-mentah dakwaan yang dibuat oleh Ketua Dewan Ulama, Mohamed Daud Iraqi.
Nik Aziz juga tidak dapat menentukan apakah Mat Iraq memberi nasihat ataupun beliau (Mat Iraqi) ada bukti bila menuduh berlaku rasuah dalam pemilihan PAS.
Saya ingin penjenguk fikir satu perkara sebelum menilai tulisan saudara Mohd Sayuti Omar bertajuk “Jangan Sembunyi Rasuah Bawah Kupiah “Celoteh Murai 45” melalui blognya untuk renungan bersama. Saya perturunkan beberapa para untuk tetapan.
Hakikatnya PAS sudah lama bergelumang dengan RASUAH SECARA TERANG-TERANGAN.
Bukan sekadar menawarkan ‘syurga’ dan perkara-perkara Islam sahaja.
Ambil sahaja fatwa Nik Aziz “Beri duit ambil, beri kain pakai, beri gula kacau, bila mengundi pangkah bulan. …”
Kata-kata ini merujuk kepada kononnya ‘rasuah UMNO dan Barisan Nasional (BN)’ kepada pengundi pada musim pilihan raya.
Pokoknya – jika DUIT, KAIN, KOPI, GULA bersifat rasuah, apakah wajar pengundi PAS (sudah pasti Islam) mengambilnya? Apakah agama Islam menggalakkan orang Islam pejam mata mengambil apa sahaja bentuk pemberian berunsur rasuah.
dipetik dari http://hambali1.blogspot.com
Tidakkah PAS menganggap wang, kain dan minuman itu rasuah? Kenapa kepada penyokong dan pengikut PAS ‘pemberian UMNO dan BN itu halal’ dan kepada penyokong UMNO dan BN haram?
Setahu saya rasuah berlaku apabila ada orang memberi dan menerima. Dia bukan di pihak pemberi sahaja. Malah lebih buruk, apabila Nik Aziz berfatwa ‘menghalalkan orang PAS menerima rasuah, walaupun wang, kain, kopi dan gula’.
Jadi tidak hairan kalau dalam pemilihan parti, ada perbuatan rasuah dilakukan dan cita-cita untuk menang dalam pemilihan tetap tinggi, kalaupun pemimpin PAS mendakwa merekalah benar-benar Islam.
Jadi jom kita tinjau apa kata Sayuti:
1. Mat Iraq tidak dikenakan apa-apa tindakan. Kalau benar tidak ada rasuah dalam PAS kenapa Mat Iraq tidak dikenakan tindakan disiplin? Apakah PAS memberi amaran kepada Mat Iraq? Kalau amaran kenapa pula tidak disebut ia diberikan amaran? Logik dan adilnya kalau dah buat fitnah, hukum saja jangan taruh dan simpan lagi. Pas tentu arif mengenai bahaya fitnah dan kata-kata Rasulullah mengenai anaknya Fatimah! Apakah PAS juga mengamalkan tindakan double standard macam parti cap keris itu?
2. Hadi (Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang) cuba menyembunyikan isu rasuah atau politik wang di bawah kupiah kerana nak jaga maruah parti. Tentu Hadi tahu apa hukumnya hipokrit dan munafik serta persoalan di Mahsyar kelak. Kalau Hadi juga berbuat begitu bermakna Hadi juga mengamalkan politik tusuk punca dalam kain?
3. Murai cukup benci kalau orang bercakap; berkatalah yang benar walaupun pahit, tetapi bila kena gilirannya sendiri yang pahit tidak mahu dikatakan dan hanya suka mengatakan yang manis-manis sahaja. Keputusan yang Pas ambil berhubung dengan rasuah itu menjelaskan bagaimana wibawa para ulama dalam PAS itu sendiri!
Sebenarnya bagi PAS, memang dia pandai menutup kelemahan parti dan pemimpinnya.
PAS berbeza dengan UMNO bukan dalam konteks Islamnya tetapi cara pemimpin utama PAS menutup dosa dan kelemahan pemimpinnya.
Saya bersetuju dengan Sayuti kalau beliau mengandaikan PAS menutup perbuatan rasuah dengan kopiahnya.
Bukan ini kali pertama PAS menutup kelemahan pemimpinnya. Ada beberapa kes rasuah lain PAS selindungkan, termasuk rasuah dalam Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan.
PAS juga bijak menutup malu parti dan pemimpinnya. Lihatlah berapa banyak kes khalwat dan ‘main dengan bini’ orang PAS boleh tutup rapat-rapat.
Inilah sahaja kelebihan pemimpin dan ahli PAS. Pemimpin tutup kesilapan dan ahli menerima dan kunci mulut. ‘Tidak baik memperkatakan dan menyebarkan aib orang lain”
Tetapi UMNO, pemimpin dan hali tidak reti tutup atau lindungi salah laku pemimpinnya.
Pemimpin buka mulut seluas-luasnya kalau ada perbuatan rasuah di kalangan pemimpin dan ahli UMNO jadi tukang karut yang menjaja ke seluruh negara. “Lebih banyak dedah, walaupun aib, lebih seronok”.
Lihat sahaja isu rasuah dalam pemilihan parti UMNO yang lalu. Yang dipanggil dan didakwa beratus-ratus. Belum tentu salah sudah nampak bersalah.
Yang kena tindakan seorang dua tetapi hebohnya sampai satu dunia.
Lebih memburukkan keadaan yang tidak didakwa ada beratus-ratus dan selepas pemilihan, Jawatankuasa Disiplin pun tidak berfungsi dan UMNO dilihat parti yang mengamalkan rasuah.
Sewajarnya kalau mahu nampak bersih, bicara dan dakwa dan bagi yang bersih, umumkan nama mereka sebagai ‘bersih daripada rasuah’, bukan longgokkan dengan yang memang sewajarnya didakwa.
Akhirnya, kononnya mahu dilihat bersih dan bersedia menjadi telus – UMNO dilihat parti kotor dan rasuah sedangkan PAS parti bersih dan Islam.
Tiba pilihan raya UMNO yang telus putih mata dan PAS yang menutup dosa dan kejahatan di bawah kopiah di lihat bersih dan disokong oleh rakyat yang dibutakan mata melalui fatwa – termasuk fatwa Nik Aziz mengenai duit, wang, kopi dan gula
Pakatan Rakyat afraid of critism!
The Pakatan Rakyat state government does not practise what it preaches when it comes to freedom of information and open discussion as the decision by the rights and privileges committee of the Selangor legislative assembly shows the administration is bent on silencing critics, former Selangor Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Toyo said today.
Commenting on his impending suspension together with four fellow Barisan Nasional (BN) assemblymen the Sungai Panjang state assemblyman, he said the move also reeked of revenge.
"We regret the Speaker (Teng Chang Khim) has resorted to this cruel act of muzzling assemblymen who give constructive criticism," Mohd Khir told the media at his office in Glenmarie.
"I can take it if they want to suspend me for one year for not attending the select committee on competency, accountability and transparency (Selcat) hearing but suspending the four other assemblyman for suggesting that the hearing should be held behind closed doors and not be made a political game is not right.
"What they have done goes against all they have been proclaiming about freedom of information." he said, adding that this will not stop BN assemblymen from speaking up.
Mohd Khir faces up to a year’s suspension and also stands to lose his allowance of more than RM4,000 a month and other perks such as claims for office phone, driver, entertainment and special allowances. In addition, he faces a six-month suspension for each of three insulting statement he made about the Selcat in his blog and the media, as well as loss of allowance and perks.
His colleagues Datuk Warno Dogol (Sabak), Mohd Isa Abu Kasim (Batang Kali), Datuk Marsum Paing (Dengkil) and Datuk Mohamed Idris Abdu Bakar (Hulu Bernam) each face a six-month suspension and loss of allowances and perks for making statements that defamed the assembly.
The Selcat hearing was held to scrutinise the excesses of the now defunct wives of Selangor BN parliamentarians and state assemblymen welfare organization (Balkis) which was headed by Mohd Khir’s wife Datin Seri Zahrah Kechik before it was dissolved following the fall of BN in Selangor during 2008 general election.
"If Selcat is really serious about upholding transparency and accountability they should check on several matters in the state government," Mohd Khir said, citing, among others, the awarding of tenders, profits from sand mining, the involvement of state executive councillor Liu in stopping Subang Jaya Municipal Council (MPSJ) officers from carrying out their duties, the appointment of contractors in the local authorities and the Klang bus station fiasco.
Commenting on his impending suspension together with four fellow Barisan Nasional (BN) assemblymen the Sungai Panjang state assemblyman, he said the move also reeked of revenge.
"We regret the Speaker (Teng Chang Khim) has resorted to this cruel act of muzzling assemblymen who give constructive criticism," Mohd Khir told the media at his office in Glenmarie.
"I can take it if they want to suspend me for one year for not attending the select committee on competency, accountability and transparency (Selcat) hearing but suspending the four other assemblyman for suggesting that the hearing should be held behind closed doors and not be made a political game is not right.
"What they have done goes against all they have been proclaiming about freedom of information." he said, adding that this will not stop BN assemblymen from speaking up.
Mohd Khir faces up to a year’s suspension and also stands to lose his allowance of more than RM4,000 a month and other perks such as claims for office phone, driver, entertainment and special allowances. In addition, he faces a six-month suspension for each of three insulting statement he made about the Selcat in his blog and the media, as well as loss of allowance and perks.
His colleagues Datuk Warno Dogol (Sabak), Mohd Isa Abu Kasim (Batang Kali), Datuk Marsum Paing (Dengkil) and Datuk Mohamed Idris Abdu Bakar (Hulu Bernam) each face a six-month suspension and loss of allowances and perks for making statements that defamed the assembly.
The Selcat hearing was held to scrutinise the excesses of the now defunct wives of Selangor BN parliamentarians and state assemblymen welfare organization (Balkis) which was headed by Mohd Khir’s wife Datin Seri Zahrah Kechik before it was dissolved following the fall of BN in Selangor during 2008 general election.
"If Selcat is really serious about upholding transparency and accountability they should check on several matters in the state government," Mohd Khir said, citing, among others, the awarding of tenders, profits from sand mining, the involvement of state executive councillor Liu in stopping Subang Jaya Municipal Council (MPSJ) officers from carrying out their duties, the appointment of contractors in the local authorities and the Klang bus station fiasco.
The Anwar Dilemma
A Letter to Bru, the New Yorker's Malay Dilemma
from: http://rockybru.com
A young friend sent me an e-mail yesterday, wondering if I'd read the article on Malaysia by the New Yorker magazine.
The article's headline is The Malay Dilemma, borrowed from Dr Mahathir's once-controversial and formerly-banned book.
I thought that Anwar's Malay Dilemma would have been a more apt title for the article. If you rely wholly on the New Yorker for your analysis on Malaysian politics, you'd think that Malaysia is a nation almost beyond redemption, where salvation lies with one man.
The following, in italic, is my young friend's email.
Dear Rocky, I have always wondered why that, as a young Malay, my morale has been very low since coming back in 2005. Why my non-Malay friends are publicly telling me that it is because 'your skin-color people' that Malaysia is going down the drain and to the dogs. After reading this article, I think I have finally understood why. This is the reality that Anwar has managed to paint of Malays and Malaysia. Through the blogs and American media, he has managed to paint this reality in the minds of all Malaysians and the world. This article was forwarded by a buddy of mine in the States, nasi lemak, with the following comment. You should read the comments after the article. Thought it'd be interesting read for you. Cheers.
The comment;
Anwar will never be the Aung San Suu Kyi of Malaysia. How can you be, when for the first 2/3 of your career, you were the strongest man in the Junta?
"So many angry posts about Anifah and his "big mouth," but no one wants to link it to Anwar's already-launched American-seduction PR campaign. Just read that pandering New Yorker article. The impression I get is Malaysia is a backward neo-theocracy, with UMNO warlords running it to the ground Islamic-fundamentalism style - and Anwar is the sincere, self-doubting "messenger of god" to save the nation. What a load of cock. Sounds just like Ahmed Chelabi when he was bullshitting the Americans into invading Iraq - paint the nation as an American enemy, and they will take notice. BN is suffering from corruption and apathy, yes; Malaysia has alot of socially outdated and ineffective policies, especially race-wise, yes; people are fedup - yes! But framing us as Baath-esque, blind-to-the-world, anti-semetic religious rice-monkeys? Come on. Anwar is a true-blue traitor for going around shitting on Malaysia with such fervor, but it seems so many people want him to do exactly that. Says alot about his supporters and what they sincerely think.
People will believe exactly what they want, to get whatever it they want;
that is life. Anwar is just providing himself as a receptacle for our
people's projection - using their grouses as his personal platform to be Big Boss of Malaysia. Maybe the people need some kind of figure like that, to embody and fight for their frustrations. But, for the love of God, please know what kind of receptacle you are using. You may not notice it is a toilet bowl.
Nothing Anifah said is new - anyone with a passing interest in Malaysia
would have heard the Altantuya accusations (even my American friends have read it in passing somewhere on international news sites, and they don't particularly give a damn about this part of the world).
With the New Yorker article, the American intellectual community may now finally have Malaysia as a dirty blip on the radar. What Anifah did, in the light of this, is in my opinion, appropriate. Good thing Secretary Clinton didn't seem to take too much interest in Anwar personally (while maintaining that America brought up rule of law and due process during discussions). I think she can smell a rat here, especially considering Anwar's escapades with neo-con war-peddlers like Paul Wolfowitz. For my money, she knows how Chelabi played Wolfowitz (perhaps also the other way round), and won't take the risk on another asshole with a personal agenda. And despite his best efforts, Anwar will never be the Aung San Suu Kyi of Malaysia. How can you be, when for the first 2/3 of your career, you were the strongest man in the Junta?
By the way, I fully expect this comment, and others of similar leanings, to be mostly ignored or ridiculed. Right now, the popular thing to do is
rubbish the government. All the cool kids are doing it.
So will most of their fanboys."
at 11:01 PM
from: http://rockybru.com
A young friend sent me an e-mail yesterday, wondering if I'd read the article on Malaysia by the New Yorker magazine.
The article's headline is The Malay Dilemma, borrowed from Dr Mahathir's once-controversial and formerly-banned book.
I thought that Anwar's Malay Dilemma would have been a more apt title for the article. If you rely wholly on the New Yorker for your analysis on Malaysian politics, you'd think that Malaysia is a nation almost beyond redemption, where salvation lies with one man.
The following, in italic, is my young friend's email.
Dear Rocky, I have always wondered why that, as a young Malay, my morale has been very low since coming back in 2005. Why my non-Malay friends are publicly telling me that it is because 'your skin-color people' that Malaysia is going down the drain and to the dogs. After reading this article, I think I have finally understood why. This is the reality that Anwar has managed to paint of Malays and Malaysia. Through the blogs and American media, he has managed to paint this reality in the minds of all Malaysians and the world. This article was forwarded by a buddy of mine in the States, nasi lemak, with the following comment. You should read the comments after the article. Thought it'd be interesting read for you. Cheers.
The comment;
Anwar will never be the Aung San Suu Kyi of Malaysia. How can you be, when for the first 2/3 of your career, you were the strongest man in the Junta?
"So many angry posts about Anifah and his "big mouth," but no one wants to link it to Anwar's already-launched American-seduction PR campaign. Just read that pandering New Yorker article. The impression I get is Malaysia is a backward neo-theocracy, with UMNO warlords running it to the ground Islamic-fundamentalism style - and Anwar is the sincere, self-doubting "messenger of god" to save the nation. What a load of cock. Sounds just like Ahmed Chelabi when he was bullshitting the Americans into invading Iraq - paint the nation as an American enemy, and they will take notice. BN is suffering from corruption and apathy, yes; Malaysia has alot of socially outdated and ineffective policies, especially race-wise, yes; people are fedup - yes! But framing us as Baath-esque, blind-to-the-world, anti-semetic religious rice-monkeys? Come on. Anwar is a true-blue traitor for going around shitting on Malaysia with such fervor, but it seems so many people want him to do exactly that. Says alot about his supporters and what they sincerely think.
People will believe exactly what they want, to get whatever it they want;
that is life. Anwar is just providing himself as a receptacle for our
people's projection - using their grouses as his personal platform to be Big Boss of Malaysia. Maybe the people need some kind of figure like that, to embody and fight for their frustrations. But, for the love of God, please know what kind of receptacle you are using. You may not notice it is a toilet bowl.
Nothing Anifah said is new - anyone with a passing interest in Malaysia
would have heard the Altantuya accusations (even my American friends have read it in passing somewhere on international news sites, and they don't particularly give a damn about this part of the world).
With the New Yorker article, the American intellectual community may now finally have Malaysia as a dirty blip on the radar. What Anifah did, in the light of this, is in my opinion, appropriate. Good thing Secretary Clinton didn't seem to take too much interest in Anwar personally (while maintaining that America brought up rule of law and due process during discussions). I think she can smell a rat here, especially considering Anwar's escapades with neo-con war-peddlers like Paul Wolfowitz. For my money, she knows how Chelabi played Wolfowitz (perhaps also the other way round), and won't take the risk on another asshole with a personal agenda. And despite his best efforts, Anwar will never be the Aung San Suu Kyi of Malaysia. How can you be, when for the first 2/3 of your career, you were the strongest man in the Junta?
By the way, I fully expect this comment, and others of similar leanings, to be mostly ignored or ridiculed. Right now, the popular thing to do is
rubbish the government. All the cool kids are doing it.
So will most of their fanboys."
at 11:01 PM
Rabu, Mei 20, 2009
Pas Semakin Mencemarkan Islam
Demi mencapai kemenangan sudah tidak mengira sesuatu itu halal atau Haram, malam tadi satu ceramah pembangkang yang sepatutnya dihadiri oleh Nizar Menteri Besar Makamah Tinggi, tetapi diganti oleh penceramah DAP yang membaca ayat suci Al.Quaran di Perak semasa pilihanraya kecil Bkt Gantang yang lalu.
Dalam ceramahnya menyatakan beliau telah diberi kebenaran oleh Tok Guru Nik Aziz untuk membaca ayat2 Al Quran dan kalau saya baca dapat pahala, yang sedihnya penyokong di bawah terus bertakbir Allah Huakbar.
Ingatlah sebagaimana firman Allah SWT yang bermaksud ' tidak akan redha Yahudi dan Nasrani sehingga kamu mengikut agama(ajaran) mereka'.. adakah ayat Al-Quran ini tidak lagi memberi apa-apa makna kepada penyokong PAS..
Umat Islam dalam pembangkang sudah jadi kacaubilau, sudah tak dapat menilai sesuatu yang ditegah dalam agama, 'seratah' tidak berpendidikan agama, tapi tau jugalah halal haramnya, sedangkan wanita Islam didalam haid diharamkan membaca ayat2 suci Al. Quran, malah kita yang tidak ada wudhu' tidak boleh memegang kitab suci itu tanpa berlapik.
Islam semakin lama semakin tercemar akibat ajaran songsang PAS... Halal di kata haram, haram di kata halal, rasuah di kata hadiah, ayat suci al-quran dijaja-jaja sehingga kaum kafir yang tidak sepatutnya pun membaca potongan ayat Al-quran.
Sebab itu diakhir2 ini fatwa2 yang dikeluarkan oleh Nik Aziz sangat bertentangan dengan agama, tapi malangnya pengikut dan penyokong Pas yang tahu dan faham agama sama mengiakan apa yang di fatwakan oleh Nik Aziz, salah atau betul, tak berani nak membantah, hanya jadi pak turut sahaja apa yang dinyatakan oleh Tok Guru Mereka, Tok Guru adalah Manusia bukan Malaikat dah tentu buat kesilapan, tetapi penyokong Pas menanggap Nik Aziz maksum,
Inilah akibatnya apabila Islam PAS muncul daru ajaran ulama 'mee celup' mengaku ulama... sehingga menghancurkan ajaran Islam yang sebenar...
http://seratah.blogspot.com
Dalam ceramahnya menyatakan beliau telah diberi kebenaran oleh Tok Guru Nik Aziz untuk membaca ayat2 Al Quran dan kalau saya baca dapat pahala, yang sedihnya penyokong di bawah terus bertakbir Allah Huakbar.
Ingatlah sebagaimana firman Allah SWT yang bermaksud ' tidak akan redha Yahudi dan Nasrani sehingga kamu mengikut agama(ajaran) mereka'.. adakah ayat Al-Quran ini tidak lagi memberi apa-apa makna kepada penyokong PAS..
Umat Islam dalam pembangkang sudah jadi kacaubilau, sudah tak dapat menilai sesuatu yang ditegah dalam agama, 'seratah' tidak berpendidikan agama, tapi tau jugalah halal haramnya, sedangkan wanita Islam didalam haid diharamkan membaca ayat2 suci Al. Quran, malah kita yang tidak ada wudhu' tidak boleh memegang kitab suci itu tanpa berlapik.
Islam semakin lama semakin tercemar akibat ajaran songsang PAS... Halal di kata haram, haram di kata halal, rasuah di kata hadiah, ayat suci al-quran dijaja-jaja sehingga kaum kafir yang tidak sepatutnya pun membaca potongan ayat Al-quran.
Sebab itu diakhir2 ini fatwa2 yang dikeluarkan oleh Nik Aziz sangat bertentangan dengan agama, tapi malangnya pengikut dan penyokong Pas yang tahu dan faham agama sama mengiakan apa yang di fatwakan oleh Nik Aziz, salah atau betul, tak berani nak membantah, hanya jadi pak turut sahaja apa yang dinyatakan oleh Tok Guru Mereka, Tok Guru adalah Manusia bukan Malaikat dah tentu buat kesilapan, tetapi penyokong Pas menanggap Nik Aziz maksum,
Inilah akibatnya apabila Islam PAS muncul daru ajaran ulama 'mee celup' mengaku ulama... sehingga menghancurkan ajaran Islam yang sebenar...
http://seratah.blogspot.com
Langgan:
Catatan (Atom)